Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
这就不是部适合he的片子……求美女独自美丽！只管自己累不累不在乎女朋友死活的男的有多远滚多远好嘛！还有，不是毛晓彤出演，真没必要看这种片子的。美女颜值加一星，男主颜值真的太不可。
1.演员是好演员。但看他俩演对手戏太别扭。
这恋爱看着挺甜的，但就是不真实。应该让导演编剧在北京的跨年夜试试不穿羽绒服不戴围巾手套骑电动车是什么感觉。还有，谁会信一个会把初次见面的男人带回家，关灯亲亲的女人，分手后会空窗两年？反正，我不信！
这男的真不应该谈恋爱就这
看着两个三十几岁的人在像两个高三的学生一样吵架，我由衷的觉得，毛晓彤挺好看啊！
这个跨年真有意义🙃
看他俩谈恋爱真的好累…
比想象中好，个人比较喜欢这样类型纯粹的片子，纯爱能忽视恋爱脑之类的问题（这里也没有吧我觉得主角价值观不错）演技很有cp感，让我在该哭的时候看哭就挺好的了
我听到男主叫乖我就难受
2022.3.24（3⭐） 禁止画饼。养只狗吧。
毫无新意特别平淡，可能听身边朋友吐感情苦水都比这个有波澜一点。拍得也很没劲。部分演员演技和台词是肉眼可见的差……
虽然挺真实的，但这种流水线式爱情片还是少拍点吧
最后结尾还是蛮不错的，情感推上去了。但矛盾点的引发有点过于普通了。
恋爱最开始的时候都是甜的，哪怕一通电话、一起买菜、一起坐公交都是幸福和美好的回忆，可当时间慢慢沉淀，两个人从性格、职业到家庭上的分歧也会开始分散两个人的精力，这个时候更需要两个人互相理解、相互扶持。
最好的前任就要像死了一样 不要再打扰对方的生活
抖音片段大集合，毫无新意，掠过疫情，一段mv和一段独白后俩人复合了，😂这样流水线上的片一天可以写三个吧 能不能用点心！！
三十而已的二搭加上演员请就位的打包，日常生活就像白水一样，拍的太电视剧化了，以及——故事没有任何悬念。
以年为单位 以光为速度😅女主性格真的和我好像啊 对我来说陪伴的意义甚至大于相爱。我需要你的时候你在 这才是我要的安全感。感受比真实更重要 如果我感受不到你爱我 那我真的会很难说服我自己。看到最后随着男女主的终成眷属飘过的一条条弹幕 一个个名字 也算是见证了很多人的青春和爱情吧。毛晓彤好甜啊演技也越来越好了 果然搞事业的甜妹yyds👍
恋爱过程中与他们想通的情绪太多，但是现实中的恋人或许处理的方式各不相同，谁不是总在崩溃中自愈。ps看过太多现世向的结局，这个happy end我爱了，相爱的两人不应该消失人海呀
一个好的前任，就应该像死了一样，不再打扰别人的生活。好在他们分开后都保持单身，最后才有机会再复合。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
